Welcome, facility dynamos and property visionaries! Buckle up because we’re embarking on a thrilling ride into the future, where Artificial Intelligence (AI) is not just a buzzword but the backbone of revolutionary facility management. It’s here to stay and is reshaping our world in ways we’re just beginning to grasp. So, let’s dive into the top ways AI will transform facilities management in the next five years, packing our journey with insights and, of course, a bit of fun. 🚀
1. Predictive Maintenance: The Crystal Ball of Facility Management
Remember when maintenance schedules were as unpredictable as a game of bingo? Those days are behind us. AI, with its predictive prowess, is turning maintenance into a science fiction-like narrative, where machines alert us about potential issues before they even occur. Imagine receiving a notification that your HVAC system will fail in two weeks unless a specific component is replaced. That’s not magic; it’s AI-driven predictive maintenance. This crystal ball capability means less downtime, reduced costs, and a big sigh of relief for facility managers everywhere.
2. Energy Optimization: AI, The Green Warrior
In an era where going green is not just a choice but a necessity, AI emerges as the champion of energy efficiency. Through real-time data analysis and learning from usage patterns, AI optimizes building energy consumption without compromising comfort. It adjusts lighting, heating, and air conditioning based on occupancy and even weather forecasts, slashing utility bills and carbon footprints. Picture this: your building not just consuming energy, but doing so with the wisdom of an eco-savant. That’s the power of AI in action.
3. Enhanced Security: AI as the Watchful Protector
Gone are the days when security meant bulky cameras and sleep-deprived guards. Enter AI: the smart, watchful protector that never blinks. AI-powered surveillance systems can now identify unusual activities, recognize faces, and even detect potential threats before they manifest. But it’s not just about keeping intruders out; it’s about ensuring a safe, secure environment for everyone inside. AI’s vigilant eyes augment our security measures, making our facilities as secure as Fort Knox, but with a lot more intelligence.
4. Seamless Automation and Integration: The AI Symphony
Imagine orchestrating a symphony where every instrument is a different building system, from lighting to HVAC to security. AI is the maestro, harmonizing these systems in a seamless performance of efficiency and convenience. It enables diverse systems to communicate and collaborate, creating an integrated, intelligent ecosystem. This automation not only enhances operational efficiency but also elevates the user experience, making buildings more intuitive and responsive to the needs of those within.
5. Intelligent Space Management: AI as the Space Guru
Space, the final frontier—especially in urban settings where every square foot counts. AI steps in as the ultimate space guru, optimizing the use of available space and adapting to changing needs through smart layout planning and usage analysis. It’s about making the most of what we have, whether it’s reconfiguring layouts for better flow, maximizing occupancy without overcrowding, or even predicting future space requirements. AI makes spaces not just smarter, but more adaptable and efficient.
6. Advanced Tenant Services: AI as the Ultimate Concierge
Welcome to the era of AI-powered tenant services, where AI acts as the ultimate concierge, enhancing tenant experience through personalized services and interactions. From voice-activated controls and intelligent assistance to predictive maintenance that ensures everything works perfectly, AI is elevating the standard of tenant services to unprecedented levels. It’s about creating environments where tenants don’t just reside or work; they thrive.
7. Data-Driven Decision Making: AI, The Insight Wizard
In facilities management, knowledge isn’t just power; it’s the key to innovation, efficiency, and sustainability. AI transforms vast oceans of data into actionable insights, guiding decisions from operational changes to strategic investments. It’s like having an insight wizard at your disposal, turning data into a roadmap for future-proofing your facilities and ensuring they not only meet the current needs but are also ready for what’s next.
8. The Evolution of Facility Management Roles: AI as the Catalyst
As AI reshapes the landscape of facilities management, it also redefines the roles within it. Facility managers evolve into tech-savvy strategists, leveraging AI tools to make smarter decisions and lead their teams. This shift emphasizes the importance of upskilling and embracing technology, ensuring that the human element in facility management grows alongside its AI counterparts.
Conclusion
As we step boldly into an AI-enhanced future, remember, the essence of facilities management is not just about maintaining spaces but evolving with them. The next five years will revolutionize our roles, making us not just caretakers but pioneers at the forefront of technological innovation. Embrace AI as the transformative force it is, and let’s lead our buildings into a smarter, more efficient, and sustainable future. The journey is just beginning, and the possibilities are endless. Here’s to shaping the future of facilities management together—smartly, sustainably, and with AI by our side.
Building automation systems (BAS) or “smart buildings”, are increasingly popular in commercial and industrial buildings. Why? Because they improve energy efficiency and reduce costs by integrating and automated systems such as lighting, HVAC, and security. While these systems of systems are often associated with larger commercial or industrial facilities, advances in technology are lowering price points enough for smaller building owners to access the benefits. But before you invest, consider the pros and cons of a building automation system.
What is an Building Automation System?
Building automation systems use a combination of sensors, controls, and algorithms to monitor and manage building systems. These systems can be integrated with a building’s existing infrastructure, such as HVAC and lighting systems, to create a centralized control system that can adjust and optimize building operations in real time. For example, a BAS can automatically adjust the temperature and ventilation in a building based on occupancy levels and outside weather conditions or turn off lights in unoccupied areas to reduce energy waste.
Building Automation System Pros
Automated building systems have the potential to significantly improve energy efficiency, reduce costs, and improve building comfort and productivity.
Greater Energy Efficiency
AS can use occupancy sensors and time schedules to control lighting and HVAC systems, ensuring that they are only running when needed and at optimal levels. By reducing energy usage during periods of low occupancy, such as nights and weekends, a BAS can help to significantly reduce energy costs.
Better Occupant Experiences
By optimizing building systems for comfort, such as temperature and lighting, BAS can help to create a more comfortable and productive work environment. This can lead to improved employee satisfaction, reduced absenteeism, and increased productivity.
Reduce Maintenance Repair and Costs
By continuously monitoring and optimizing building systems, a BAS can identify and diagnose issues before they become major problems, allowing for timely maintenance and repairs. This can help to extend the lifespan of building systems, reduce repair costs, and minimize downtime.
Real-time Analytics
One key feature of a BAS is its ability to provide real-time monitoring and data analytics. By collecting and analyzing data from building systems, such as energy usage and occupancy levels, a BAS can help building owners and managers identify areas of inefficiency and opportunities for improvement. This can help to inform future decisions around building upgrades, retrofits, and maintenance, allowing building owners and managers to optimize their operations and save money over the long term.
Energy Regulation Compliance
With energy codes and regulations becoming increasingly stringent, it is becoming more important for building owners and managers to optimize their energy usage and reduce waste. By implementing a BAS, building owners and managers can demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, and potentially qualify for tax credits and other incentives.
Building Automation System Cons
Despite the many benefits of automated building systems, there are some potential drawbacks to consider.
Upfront Costs
Building owners may need to invest a significant amount of money to purchase and install the necessary hardware and software to create a fully integrated BAS. This cost can be a barrier for some building owners, particularly for smaller facilities with limited budgets.
Complex Installation
Building owners may need to work with a team of engineers and technicians to design, install, and configure the system, which can be time-consuming and require specialized expertise.
Technical Issues
While BAS systems are designed to be reliable, there is always a risk of technical issues and system failures. These issues can cause downtime and disrupt building operations, which can be costly and frustrating for building owners and occupants.
Staff Training
Adopting a BAS may require building owners to train their staff on how to use the new system. This can be time-consuming and may require additional resources to ensure that staff members are properly trained and understand how to use the system.
Security Concerns
As with any technology, there are potential security concerns with adopting a BAS. Building owners need to ensure that the system is properly secured and protected against cyber threats, as a security breach could have serious consequences for building operations and occupant safety.
While there are pros and cons to adopting an automated building system, building owners and managers should also consider the effects their decisions have on broader issues like climate change. Buildings make up an enormous amount of the world’s energy use and green house gas emissions. Reducing emissions takes collective action. Lower your building’s carbon footprint is doing your part.
AI and machine learning (ML) are often used interchangeable, but they’re not technically the same thing. However, the difference is smaller than you think, and once you understand it, you’ll never mistake the two again. The following is a very basic explanation and omits many technical aspects of AI and ML which go beyond the scope of the intended audience. The definitions and examples attempt to lay a foundation for further exploration around these topics.
Artificial Intelligence: The Entire Robot
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad term that refers to creating machines that can perform tasks that normally require human intelligence. Examples of such tasks include visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and language translation. There are many subsets and subfields of AI, each of which tries to solve a specific problem and/or takes a different approach to creating “intelligence”. Here are the five most recognized subsets of AI:
Natural Language Processing(NLP) focuses on enabling machines to understand, interpret, and generate human language. NLP is used in applications such as chatbots, voice assistants, and language translation. ChatGPT is an NLP.
Computer Vision is concerned with enabling machines to interpret and understand visual data from the world around them. Computer vision is used in applications such as object detection or facial recognition. Autonomous vehicles, like some Tesla models, use computer vision.
Robotics develops machines that can physically and autonomously interact with the world around them to perform tasks like assembly line work or rescue operations. Boston Dynamics focuses on robotics.
Expert Systems are designed to mimic the reason-based decision-making ability of an expert in a particular field, such as medical diagnosis or financial analysis. Expert systems are why you keep hearing about AI lawyers defending people in court.
Machine Learning involves feeding data into a machine learning algorithm and allowing it to learn from that data in order to make accurate predictions or classifications about new data.
So, ML is a subset of AI. That’s the first big difference to note. While AI is a term that encompasses a wide range of technologies and techniques, ML is a specificapproach to building AI systems.
It’s helpful to think of AI as the “entire robot”—a fully autonomous machine capable of thinking and acting like a human. However, each subset is only one part of the entire robot. Robotics attempts to develop the “body” for interacting with the environment. Computer vision gives the robot the ability to make visual sense of its world. NLP arms it with the power to communicate. ML bestows the faculty of learning. And expert systems send it to university. It’s a true Frankenstein’s monster of disparate parts, but when brought together will finally realize the goal of AI.
What’s Machine Learning?
You hear a lot about ML because it’s a critical step in creating the entire robot. Almost everything we consider to be alive must be able to learn. Birds do it. Bees to it. Heck, even amoebas do it. But despite its ubiquity in the world of the living, learning is incredibly complex. Therefore, ML is taking on one of the biggest challenges, but it’s a triumph that offers the biggest ROI. Once we create a machine that learns, we can train it to make better decisions. So how do you create a machine to learn?
ML uses statistical algorithms to enable machines to learn from data and improve their performance on specific tasks over time. ML algorithms analyze large amounts of data to identify patterns, which it uses to make predictions or decisions on new data. Like humans, ML is a process that requires that machines be “taught” by exposing them to information.
ML Example: House Price Estimator
Suppose you wanted to create a ML learning algorithm that predicts the price of a house based on its size and location. You would need two sets of data: a training set and a test set. First, we create a training set of data composed of recently sold houses with their sale price and location.
The ML then processes the training data to look for patterns. After some processing, let’s say it “learned” the following “rules”:
Houses larger than 2,000 sq ft sell for > $200K
Houses less than 2,000 sq ft sell for < $200K
Houses within 5 miles of the airport sell for < $100K
Homes within 5 miles of the lake sell for > $300K
The algorithm could then use this knowledge to predict the price of a house outside the training dataset (i.e., the test set). For example, a house that is:
2,500 sq ft and 3 miles from airport.
Since the new house is more than 2,000 sq ft, the algorithm would then apply the “> $200K” rule, but since the it’s also less than 5 miles of the airport, it would apply the “<$100K” rule. Therefore, the algorithm’s prediction would likely be “$150K”.
Next, the ML algorithm checks its guess against the actual price, which is $170K. It now has a $20,000 discrepancy it needs to resolve. It checks for more patterns and learns that, as houses of equal size get closer to the airport, they decrease in price. Through some calculations, the program can determine the changes in price by proximity and apply the data as a weighted value in its next prediction. For example, maybe each mile closer to the airport equates to a 10% decrease in price.
The machine uses this constant process of guessing and checking (called backpropagation) to improve its predictions. The more iterations and inputs, the “smarter” the algorithm gets.
“So what?”, you might ask, “Isn’t this simple logic? Why do we need a machine to do this?” Well, for one, ML can sift through data, find patterns, and test its guesses against real world data at an astonishing rate. In short, it can “learn” much quicker than humans. For another, it can juggle many more parameters than we ever could, so its guesses will inevitably we more accurate over time.
Think about all the factors that go into the price of a house besides size and location. There’s the house’s age, condition, number of rooms, the market conditions, and seller motivation just to name a few. But there are other less typical considerations like current interest rates, lot locations, or roof type. When you drill down further, you find that the real number of factors is enormous. Few sellers place a critical role on the color of a house when calculating an asking price, but what if it mattered more than we thought? What about the history of the house or the future of the neighborhood where it resides? The better our predictive capabilities, the more important these “lesser” considerations become.
ML can iterate much faster and with greater detail than we can, making it more efficient at locating “hidden” patterns. What if dark-colored houses sold for higher prices than light-colored ones? Maybe houses with more east-facing windows were cheaper than more west-facing ones. Machine learning can consider all these factors and then some—and do it in real time.
Finally, imaging adding to this learning algorithm the ability to search for, monitor, and collect house price information for a large region of the country. It would be a fully autonomous learning and predicting machine that would only get smarter the longer it worked. That’s where ML is at today.
Conclusion
It’s easy to see how ML learning algorithms are a game changer for humanity. Their application to knowledge-based work of every kind is almost limitless. What’s AI developers are attempted is the automation of thinking itself. Translate these advantages to building automation, and it’s easy to see how ML will transform the built environment. Imagine AI that could plan your building’s HVAC setpoints a week in advance based on a weekly weather forecast and price predictions for energy costs. What about a FDD system that could predict chiller failure with 98% accuracy?
Information Technology (IT) and Operations Technology (OT) are two distinct yet interconnected fields that play critical roles in modern organizations. IT deals with the use of technology to support business processes, while OT focuses on the use of technology to control and monitor industrial and commercial processes in facilities. By looking at IT vs OT systems, it’s easy to identify their major differences.
What are IT Systems?
IT systems are primarily used to support business processes, such as data storage, processing, and communication. These systems include things like enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, customer relationship management (CRM) systems, and enterprise-wide networks. They are responsible for maintaining the flow of data within an organization, and provide important services such as email, file storage, and data analysis. IT systems are also responsible for maintaining the security of an organization’s data, including firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and encryption.
What are OT Systems?
OT systems, on the other hand, are used to control and monitor industrial processes. These systems include things like programmable logic controllers (PLCs), distributed control systems (DCSs), and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems. They are responsible for controlling and monitoring the physical processes within an organization, such as manufacturing processes, power generation, and water treatment. OT systems are designed to operate in real-time and are often required to operate 24/7.
When we look at IT vs OT systems, trends show they are increasingly being integrated to improve the overall efficiency of companies and facilities. For example, a building owner might use data from an OT system to optimize their HVAC systems, or an energy company might use data from an IT system to identify and respond to potential power outages.
Network Security
One of the major differences between IT and OT is in the level of security required. IT systems are typically more connected to the internet; hence they are more exposed to cyber threats. These systems need to comply with industry-specific standards like the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI-DSS), HIPAA and SOC2. Organizations need to maintain regular backups, have intrusion detection and prevention systems, as well as have strong and regularly updated access controls in place.
OT systems on the other hand, are typically more isolated from the internet and have fewer connections to external networks. These systems need to comply with standards like IEC 62443 which are specific to industrial environments. Because of the real-time nature of their operations, organizations need to have redundancy in place and maintain backups that can be restored within minutes, have detailed incident response plans, as well as maintain physical security of the systems.
Conclusion
IT and OT systems play critical roles in modern organizations, with IT systems primarily focused on supporting business processes and OT systems focused on controlling and monitoring industrial processes. The two fields are becoming increasingly integrated, with organizations leveraging data from both types of systems to improve overall efficiency. However, they are also vastly different in terms of the level of security required, with IT systems being more exposed to cyber threats, and OT systems being more isolated and needing to comply with industrial specific standards.
Although often overlooked by building managers and engineers, data schemas are essential to the efficient building management, data analysis and system automation. That’s because schemas are the building blocks of effective database management. Without them, you foreclose your property’s potential to save energy, adopt tech, and compile valuable operational data that make your buildings run at more efficiently and at lower costs. But what are schemas and how do they work?
Database Schema Basics
Databases of all kinds must be organized in pre-determined ways. Otherwise, it’s impossible to store and retrieve data in any workable sense. Think of a schema as a naming standard “language” for how you write, store, and retrieve the information about your building—from the status of its assets to the historical data around energy use.
Just like any language, schemas have rules and conventions. Language has rules around naming things (e.g., noun, verb, etc.) and grammar (subject + verb + director object). If we don’t follow the rules, communication turns into confusion or completely breaks down. In the same way, database schema standards outline how things are stored, what they’re called, and how they’re related (i.e., relational database).
Schemas deal in metadata or “data about data”. For example, books have metadata in the form of their title, author, publisher, or call number. In the same way, buildings have data about their assets, such as asset name, location, site, or type.
For managers and engineers, schemas make recording and managing your asset database easier by ensuring your library is mapped, tagged and organized in a way that’s easily understood by machines and software. So, these standards are intended for both building owners and developers, ensuring both parties are speaking the same language.
Too often, managers and engineers use schemas customized to their site or ad hoc naming conventions that get lost when buildings change and people move on. Such informality creates confusion over time, but maintaining a standard schema ensures your software, BMS and assets can always communicate effectively.
Basic vs Advanced Schema
Some schemas are basic, recording only a few pieces of metadata (e.g., asset name, location, serial number). Other schemas are complex, recording many pieces of data. The more complex your schema, the more descriptive it is, and a more description means a “deeper” more powerful database, just as a long sentence is more descriptive than a short one. For example, consider the following two sentences:
“The dog fetched.”
“The black Labrador fetched the yellow tennis ball from its toy box.”
What are the major differences between these two sentences, and (more important) what can we do with the second sentence that we can’t do with the first?
For one, Sentence 2 contains more descriptive words (“black Labrador” “yellow” “toy box”), so we have a better understanding of the context. Second, the shorter sentence lacks an object. We know the dog fetched, but we don’t know what it fetched. The second sentence tells us—it’s the ball. In the longer sentence, we’re even given information about the situation (i.e., the Lab has a toy box). More importantly, Sentence 2 creates a relationship between the subject and the object. We can say, therefore, that the longer sentence is “relational” in that it describes how one thing (the dog) is related to another (the ball), which is related to another thing (the toy box).
These same differences exist between informal and standardised schemas. Longer, more descriptive schemas provide more context and meaning around a building asset. They’re also relational, in that they describe how one asset (e.g., temperature sensor) is related to another (e.g., AHU). Consider these two naming schemas for a temperature sensor housed on Level 9 of a hospital.
While the basic schema lists only the location (LV09) and asset name (TempS), the advanced schema extends the description to include the building, system, asset type, point type, specific location, and the device class. With these added details, we now have a relational description of the sensor. For example, we know it is part of the mechanical (M) system and part of an AHU. Therefore, we can say Schema 2 is part of a relational database, and that it gives us a greater understanding of the asset and its place in the system.
Overall, Schema 2 gives us more context and meaning than Schema 1, and we can use this information to learn more about how our buildings operate. Once we extend this schema strategy to our entire building, we have a powerful way to analyze its contents and functional efficiency.
Schema Benefits
There are many benefits to adopting and maintaining a standard database schema. Here are a few of the most important.
Software Deployment
Standard schemas create a common lexicon and database structure for software developers to use. Adopting a standard naming schema makes software deployment and management much simpler. Developers and building systems benefit from a common, predictable set of rules and naming conventions. Such standards make software development and deployment easier and cheaper because both stakeholders are working from a shared data structure. The developer can simply bolt their software package to your system, and everything works out-of-the-box.
Advanced Queries and Dynamic Lists
Conventional BMS pages are static. Their queries are hard-baked, with pre-built graphics that deliver data around points such as fault detection, temperatures, run speeds and statuses. They are “static” in that their queries never change. Your BMS will only “ask” specific questions about your system. They may be important questions, but they are, to be sure, limited. Contrary to their appearances, however, buildings aren’t static with respect to the data they produce, and managers and engineers often need to run queries and generate dynamic lists that exist outside the BMS purview. Using a relational, standardised schema allows this limitless flexibility.
For example, say you suspected one of your AHUs was starting to fail. You could run a query that identified all room temperature sensors that have been reading above 21 degrees for the last 24-hours for that specific AHU. If your schema is relational, it understands which specific sensors to target. You could then upload the data to a dynamic page to help troubleshoot performance issues. Dynamic lists like these can improve predictive failure and shorten downtimes.
Asset Replacement
With a standard relational schema, you can identify an asset’s effect on the system and impact to service. For example, a standard schema can show you the effects to other systems when you plan to replace a failed actuator. Before work begins, you can ask questions like: “Will replacing the actuator stop chilled water to the whole building or just the data center?” or “How will the replacement affect Tenant X, Y and Z?” Such insights give you and your service engineers the right information for estimating costs, cutting downtime, and ensuring better tenant outcomes.
Updating Building Data
Buildings go through many evolutions in their life cycle, and these changes affect your asset database. Standard relational schemas make updating metadata much easier and more accurate. Recording changes only requires updating one specific piece of data, like a room number or new part. After that, your system automatically adjusts names and relationships, both upstream and downstream. Standard schemas cut the time and costs of updating asset databases.
Popular Schema Standards
Today’s most popular standard schemas differ in their approach, but all attempt to standardise asset description and storage to aid interoperability and software deployment. Project Haystack is a tag-based schema focusing on streamlining operation between smart devices within buildings, homes, factories, and cities. The Brick Ontology standardises both asset labels and connections, allowing the user to create a relational database.
Conclusion
It’s difficult to make big data work for you without first putting it into a standard structure. Schemas are that structure—they’re the digital architecture of your building systems. By building your asset database with standard schema, you’re ensuring your building, tenants and occupants benefit from future invocations such as advanced analytics, AI, machine learning, and cloud computing. These are the future of building operations and facilities management. Once all buildings graduate to smart status, they’ll be connected to everything, and proptech will help managers do everything from calculating asset depreciation to managing carbon emissions.
In this article in our BACnet Basics Series, we look at Device Profiles, why they’re important and how they’re created. We’ve also included a real world example that illustrates how to use device profiles to accurately specify your own projects.
What are Device Profiles?
As we saw in BACnet Basics: What are BIBBs?, device functions come in five basic categories, each containing specific capabilities. For example, the category Data Sharing (DS) includes capabilities like Read Properties (RP), Write Properties (WP) or Change of Value (COV). If we combined all these services into a minimum collection of capabilities, we would be creating a device profile.
As an analogy, think of the profile “Automobile”. Every machine that claims to be an “automobile” needs the functions of Acceleration (A), Deceleration (D) and Maneuverability (M). Of course, there can be automobiles that do much more, but every “automobile” must, at minimum, perform these three functions (A,D,M).
Definition: BACnet device profiles define the minimum set of BACnet Interoperability Building Blocks (BIBBs) supported by a device claiming that profile. When a device claims a specific profile, you know that it contains a preset of specified functions and services. Profiles are handy because they provide a short-hand method for describing a device and its interoperability capabilities. Device profiles are organized into Groups and Families
Device Groups
Device Groups are general categories of device functions. There are four Group types:
Operator Interface—Covers the minimum capabilities for workstations and other user interface devices. Devices normally support A-side (Client) functionality.
Controller Device—Covers anything from programmable building controllers to smart sensors. Devices normally support B-side (Server) functionality, but more advanced supervisory controllers also include A-side (Client) functionality.
Control Station—Covers lighting control stations that are smaller client devices that support specific user controls such as manual light switches.
Basic Device—Covers all “miscellaneous” family functionality. Usually included alongside other device profiles.
Device Families
Each Profile Group contains various Families within it. Families cover profiles for various, supported building systems like Lighting, Life Safety, and General Purpose. For example, the Controller Device Group contains profiles for the following Family types:
(Example) Controller Family
General Purpose—General purpose controllers usually for HVAC and lighting.
Access Control—Access control controllers such as an access control panel
Lighting—Lighting controllers such as supervisory lighting controller
Life Safety—Life safety controllers such as a fire detection panel.
Elevator—Elevator controllers
Let’s zoom into the General Purpose profile family within the Controller Device Group and see what BIBBs it contains.
Building Controller (B-BC) —Field programmable and configurable supervisory controllers in HVAC and general purpose application.
Advanced Application Controller (B-AAC)—Controllers that run advanced HVAC or general purpose control applications.
Application Specific Controller (B-ASC)—Controllers that run specific HVAC or general purpose control applications.
Smart Sensor (B-SS)—Small sensors that provide sensor values to other devices.
BACnet device profile Families are organized in a container hierarchy. As you move up in complexity, you increase the minimum amount of BIBBS required. Like nesting dolls, each profile contains all the minimum profiles from the previous ones.
For example, the above General Purpose BACnet profiles increase in complexity as you move up from Smart Sensor to Building Controller. All BIBBS included in a Smart Sensor profile are always included in a Smart Actuator profile, and all the BIBBs included in those two profiles are always included in an Application Specific Controller, and so on.
Although higher level BACnet profiles contain more BIBBs, it’s not the number of profiles that matters. Each profile requires a minimum number and type of profiles. So, even if a device contains or exceeds the minimum number of BIBBs, it doesn’t guarantee it will meet the standard. It must contain the minimum number of the correct BIBBs to meet the profile standard.
Specifying Device Profiles: Boardroom Example
Let’s use the Device Profile Quick Reference Guide to see an example of how to choose the device profiles for a real-world project. Read the following scenario:
You want to outfit a medium-sized boardroom equipped with a control panel with a built-in controller. The panel will control the room’s temperature and lighting. You also need manual lighting controls near the door.
To determine the device profiles needed for the project, we can start by listing the functionality we need. We will need HVAC controls for temperature. For lighting, we will need controls for both the panel and a manual user control switch on the wall. Therefore, we will need functionality from the Controller Group and Control Station Group.
Next, we can determine what Families we need within each group.
For the Controller Group, we need:
General PurposeFamily for HVAC
Lighting Family for panel control lighting
Access ControlFamily for access
For the Control Station Group, we need:
Lighting Family for manual switch lighting control
Finally, we can choose specific profiles to fulfill our HVAC and lighting functionality.
HVAC Profiles
In the Reference Guide, we see the following profiles for the General Purpose Controller Family:
B-BC: The building controller is intended for field programmable and configurable supervisory controllers in HVAC and general purpose applications.
B-AAC: The advanced application controller is intended for controllers that run advanced HVAC or general purpose control applications. It does not require being configurable through BACnet.
B-ASC: The application specific controller is intended for controllers that run specific HVAC or general purpose control applications. It does not require being configurable through BACnet.
B-SA: The smart actuator is intended for small actuator devices that allow being commanded.
B-SS: The smart sensor is intended for small sensor devices that provide sensor values to other devices.
We can ignore the last two profiles, because we need neither actuators (B-SA) or sensors (B-SS) for the project. We can also eliminate the Building Controller (B-BC) profile because it does not require supervisory control. Depending on our HVAC needs, we could choose either the Advanced Application (B-AAC) or the Application Specific (B-ASC) profile.
Lighting Profiles
In the Reference Guide, we see the following profiles for the Lighting Controller Family:
B-LS: The lighting supervisory controller is intended for controllers in lighting applications that can command and operate subordinate lighting controllers, in particular through group write commanding.
B-LD: The lighting device is intended for lighting controllers that control individual lights or groups of lights. Normally used as leaf nodes in lighting group setups.
We would choose the B-LD profile if the panel only controls one group of lights. However, if the lighting is more complex, we might opt for the B-LS with supervisory controls.
Control Station Profiles
Because the room also requires manual user lighting controls, we need a profile from the Control Station Family. In the Reference Guide, we see the following profiles:
B-ALCS: The advanced lighting control station is intended for sophisticated control stations that support user view, control and limited configuration of lighting functionality. Provides full commanding support of lighting objects and group operations for them.
B-LCS: The lighting control station is intended for control stations that support simple control of lighting functionality and limited status indication. Provides limited support of commanding lighting objects.
The simpler B-LCS would work for this project. But, again, depending on the complexity of the room’s lighting, we might choose the more complex profile.
Conclusion
Through the Boardroom Example above, we can see how BACnet profiles make project specifications easier and more accurate. Standards and profiles support an accurate procurement process, requiring less change orders and adjustments. Defining capabilities also creates an outcomes-based workflow so that buildings function the way owners and tenants need them to.